I suggest replacing “limited mainly” with “mainly limited”. It seems to me that the term “local friction drags” should be replaced by “local drag coefficients”. I suggest replacing “model based” with “model is based”. I suggest replacing “,, , ” with “”.įor thematic reasons, I suggest combining lines 75-84 into one paragraph. I suggest replacing “1- fluid flow lines in circulation mode 2 – fluid flow lines in bypass flow mode” with “streamlines of the liquid: 1 – in circulation 2 – in bypass modes”. After all, this paragraph is part of the introduction. This information may be of interest to less advanced readers. I suggest replacing “streamlines flowing around” with “streamlines drawn around”.Ĭonsider plotting the direction of the mixture flow in Figure 1. I suggest replacing “slug regime flow-phase gas-liquid flow” with “slug regime of gas-liquid flow”. I suggest replacing “smooth pipes ” with “smooth ones ”. I suggest replacing “The shells” with “The bubble shells”. I suggest replacing “Plugged” with “Plug”. I suggest replacing “separated by the channel” with “separated along the channel”.ĭot should be introduced at the end of the sentence. I suggest replacing “modes mainly” with “modes are mainly”.
I suggest replacing “gas phase and liquid phases” with “gas and liquid phases”. The information provided in this paragraph is contradictory. I suggest replacing “cost” with “energy cost”. I suggest replacing “The grid transited the flow regime from slug to layered, which” with “The grid transition of flow regime from slug to layered one”. I suggest replacing “pressure drops” with “pressure drop”. So maybe it's worth having a specialist review the text of the article. Nevertheless, some English phrases seem to conflict with applicable rules. The text is "readable" although I am not a linguist.
Therefore, also the correctness of the obtained results does not raise any doubts. The formulation of the model (the set of equations applied) and the methodology of its solution are not objectionable. The correctness of operation of such a mesh partition was also checked on the basis of numerical calculations. Moreover, they proposed a relatively simple and cheap two-phase flow promoter to break up the slugs that are formed. In the article entitled: "Transitions of the cochlear regime in a two-phase flow in a horizontal circular tube" the authors Vitaliy Sergeyev, Nikolai Vatin, Evgeny Kotov, Daria Nemova and Svyatoslav Khorobrov presented the results of a numerical simulation of the creation of a slug flow in a horizontal circular tube.
We tried to take into account everything. We received several comments on the literature review.
Please read other papers and see how they develop this part. The literature review part was not written very well. Why didn't you make one single paragraph here? Power plants, sewage systems and metallurgy Many comments and recommendations will also be taken into account in future studies. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the comments that have improved the work. It seems everything is copied and pasted from another documents without considering the requirements of writing a paper. I only read 5 pages of your paper and with this quality I could not go further and accept it. Please see my comments in the attached file.
0 kommentar(er)
